You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New insight into motor adaptation to pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Pain, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00286.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P.W. Hodges, M.W. Coppieters, D. MacDonald, J. Cholewicki |
| Abstract |
Movement changes in pain. Unlike the somewhat stereotypical response of limb muscles to pain, trunk muscle responses are highly variable when challenged by pain in that region. This has led many to question the existence of a common underlying theory to explain the adaptation. Here, we tested the hypotheses that (1) adaptation in muscle activation in acute pain leads to enhanced spine stability, despite variation in the pattern of muscle activation changes; and (2) individuals would use a similar 'signature' pattern for tasks with different mechanical demands. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Canada | 4 | 13% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| Norway | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 23% |
| Unknown | 40 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 7% |
| Engineering | 13 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 55 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2014.
All research outputs
#1,154,590
of 24,639,073 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pain
#127
of 1,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,255
of 290,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pain
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,639,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.