| Title |
Clinician–Patient Agreement About the Work Disability Problem of Patients Having Persistent Pain: Why it Matters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10926-012-9387-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie-France Coutu, Raymond Baril, Marie-José Durand, Daniel Côté, Geneviève Cadieux |
| Abstract |
Studies from different fields documenting the differences between clinicians' and workers' representations have not elucidated where the differences exist or how they can be resolved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 18% |
| Psychology | 8 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2013.
All research outputs
#18,329,207
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#532
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,669
of 170,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.