You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Revised guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): recommendations by a group of European experts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gut, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304356 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hans F A Vasen, Ignacio Blanco, Katja Aktan-Collan, Jessica P Gopie, Angel Alonso, Stefan Aretz, Inge Bernstein, Lucio Bertario, John Burn, Gabriel Capella, Chrystelle Colas, Christoph Engel, Ian M Frayling, Maurizio Genuardi, Karl Heinimann, Frederik J Hes, Shirley V Hodgson, John A Karagiannis, Fiona Lalloo, Annika Lindblom, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Pal Møller, Torben Myrhoj, Fokko M Nagengast, Yann Parc, Maurizio Ponz de Leon, Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo, Julian R Sampson, Astrid Stormorken, Rolf H Sijmons, Sabine Tejpar, Huw J W Thomas, Nils Rahner, Juul T Wijnen, Heikki Juhani Järvinen, Gabriela Möslein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 499 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 78 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 66 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 12% |
| Other | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 9% |
| Other | 109 | 21% |
| Unknown | 107 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 235 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 58 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 2% |
| Psychology | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 37 | 7% |
| Unknown | 122 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,109,038
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#670
of 7,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,684
of 300,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#5
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.