| Title |
Hydraulic constraints modify optimal photosynthetic profiles in giant sequoia trees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-016-3705-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony R. Ambrose, Wendy L. Baxter, Christopher S. Wong, Stephen S. O. Burgess, Cameron B. Williams, Rikke R. Næsborg, George W. Koch, Todd E. Dawson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 34% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2016.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#4,423
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,975
of 357,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#47
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.