You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is restoring flora the same as restoring fauna? Lessons learned from koalas and mining rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12046 |
| Authors |
Romane H. Cristescu, Jonathan Rhodes, Céline Frére, Peter B. Banks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 17% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2013.
All research outputs
#1,228,086
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#779
of 4,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,972
of 301,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#4
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.