↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of the Cutaneous Bacterial Communities of Two Giant Salamander Subspecies

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Characterization of the Cutaneous Bacterial Communities of Two Giant Salamander Subspecies
Published in
Microbial Ecology, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00248-016-0859-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Obed Hernández-Gómez, Steven J. A. Kimble, Jeffrey T. Briggler, Rod N. Williams

Abstract

Pathogens currently threaten the existence of many amphibian species. In efforts to combat global declines, researchers have characterized the amphibian cutaneous microbiome as a resource for disease management. Characterization of microbial communities has become useful in studying the links between organismal health and the host microbiome. Hellbender salamanders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) provide an ideal system to explore the cutaneous microbiome as this species requires extensive conservation management across its range. In addition, the Ozark hellbender subspecies (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi) exhibits chronic wounds hypothesized to be caused by bacterial infections, whereas the eastern hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) does not. We assessed the cutaneous bacterial microbiome of both subspecies at two locations in the state of Missouri, USA. Through 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing, we detected more than 1000 distinct operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the cutaneous and environmental bacterial microbiome. Phylogenetic and abundance-based dissimilarity matrices identified differences in the bacterial communities between the two subspecies, but only the abundance-based dissimilarity matrix identified differences between wounds and healthy skin on Ozark hellbenders. The higher abundance of OTUs on Ozark wounds suggests that commensal bacteria present on the skin and environment may be opportunistically colonizing the wounds. This brief exploration of the hellbender cutaneous bacterial microbiome provides foundational support for future studies seeking to understand the hellbender cutaneous bacterial microbiome and the role of the bacterial microbiota on chronic wounds of Ozark hellbenders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 27%
Student > Master 13 20%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 38%
Environmental Science 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2016.
All research outputs
#5,764,740
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#603
of 2,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,478
of 322,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#27
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.