↓ Skip to main content

Aesthetic Amenities and Safety Hazards Associated with Walking and Bicycling for Transportation in New York City

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Aesthetic Amenities and Safety Hazards Associated with Walking and Bicycling for Transportation in New York City
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12160-012-9416-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gina S. Lovasi, Ofira Schwartz-Soicher, Kathryn M. Neckerman, Kevin Konty, Bonnie Kerker, James Quinn, Andrew Rundle

Abstract

One strategy to address health problems related to insufficient physical activity is to examine modifiable neighborhood characteristics associated with active transportation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 117 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Professor 5 4%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 32 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Sports and Recreations 7 6%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Engineering 6 5%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,162,589
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#993
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,828
of 171,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#14
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.