↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Condom Use in South Africa: A Test of Two Integrative Models

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Predicting Condom Use in South Africa: A Test of Two Integrative Models
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10461-013-0423-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sander M. Eggers, Leif E. Aarø, Arjan E. R. Bos, Catherine Mathews, Hein de Vries

Abstract

This study tested two integrative socio-cognitive models, namely the information-motivation-behavioral skills model (IMB) and the I-Change model (ICM), to assess their hypothesized motivational pathways for the prediction of condom use during last sexual intercourse. Students (N = 1066) from Cape Town, South Africa, filled out questionnaires at three different time points. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that self-efficacy did not predict behavior directly but indirectly via intention. Knowledge of how to use a condom and how STIs are transmitted directly predicted behavior when modeled as hypothesized by the IMB model, but indirectly when the factors attitude, subjective norms and self-efficacy were included as mediators, as hypothesized by the ICM. It is concluded that the ICM and IMB are similar in terms of model fit and explained variance, but that the ICM had a higher proportion of significant pathways.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 26%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Psychology 14 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 17 18%