| Title |
Stochastic method for in-situ damage analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal de Physique I, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epjb/e2012-30472-8 |
| Authors |
P. Rinn, H. Heißelmann, M. Wächter, J. Peinke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 14% |
| Greece | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 43% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 29% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 50% |
| Engineering | 3 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,332,037
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique I
#141
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,846
of 289,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique I
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.