↓ Skip to main content

Variations in Sexual Identity Milestones Among Lesbians, Gay Men, and Bisexuals

Overview of attention for article published in Sexuality Research and Social Policy, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Variations in Sexual Identity Milestones Among Lesbians, Gay Men, and Bisexuals
Published in
Sexuality Research and Social Policy, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13178-014-0167-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander J. Martos, Sheila Nezhad, Ilan H. Meyer

Abstract

Despite a large body of literature covering sexual identity development milestones, we know little about differences or similarities in patterns of identity development among subgroups of the lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) population. For this study, we assessed identity milestones for 396 LGB New Yorkers, ages 18-59. Sexual identity and disclosure milestones, were measured across gender, sexual identity, race/ethnicity, and age cohort subgroups of the LGB sample. Men experienced most sexual identity milestones earlier than women, but they tended to take more time between milestones. LGBs in younger age cohorts experienced sexual identity milestones and disclosure milestones earlier than the older cohorts. Bisexual people experienced sexual identity and disclosure milestones later than gay and lesbian people. Timing of coming out milestones did not differ by race/ethnicity. By comparing differences within subpopulations, the results of this study help build understanding of the varied identity development experiences of people who are often referred to collectively as "the LGB community." LGB people face unique health and social challenges; a more complete understanding of variations among LGB people allows health professionals and social service providers to provide services that better fit the needs of LGB communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 134 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 32%
Social Sciences 28 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Unspecified 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 36 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,300,439
of 25,597,324 outputs
Outputs from Sexuality Research and Social Policy
#222
of 592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,579
of 231,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexuality Research and Social Policy
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,597,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.