↓ Skip to main content

Physical Activity in Older Adults: an Ecological Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
23 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
Physical Activity in Older Adults: an Ecological Approach
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12160-016-9837-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina M. Thornton, Jacqueline Kerr, Terry L. Conway, Brian E. Saelens, James F. Sallis, David K. Ahn, Lawrence D. Frank, Kelli L. Cain, Abby C. King

Abstract

Studies identifying correlates of physical activity (PA) at all levels of the ecological model can provide an empirical basis for designing interventions to increase older adults' PA. Applying ecological model principles, this study concurrently examined individual, psychosocial, and environmental correlates of older adults' PA to determine whether built environment factors contribute to PA over and above individual/demographic and psychosocial variables. Using a cross-sectional observational design, 726 adults, aged ≥66 years, were recruited from two US regions. Explanatory variables included demographics, self-efficacy, social support, barriers, and environmental variables measured by using geographic information systems (GIS) and self-report. Outcomes included reported walking for errands and leisure/exercise and accelerometer-measured daily moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA). Analyses employed mixed-model regressions with backward elimination. For daily MVPA, the only significant environmental variable was GIS-based proximity to a park (p < 0.001) after controlling for individual/demographic and psychosocial factors. Walking for errands was positively related to four environmental variables: reported walking/cycling facilities (p < 0.05), GIS-based intersection density (p < 0.01), mixed land use (p < 0.01), and private recreation facilities (p < 0.01). Walking for leisure/exercise was negatively related to GIS-based mixed land use (p < 0.05). Non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity, self-efficacy, and social support positively related to all three PA outcomes (p < 0.05). Correlates of older adults' PA were found at all ecological levels, supporting multiple levels of influence and need for multilevel interventions. Environmental correlates varied by PA outcome. Walking for errands exhibited the most environmental associations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 234 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 14%
Student > Master 30 13%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 54 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 34 15%
Sports and Recreations 27 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 9%
Psychology 15 6%
Other 48 21%
Unknown 62 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,004,473
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#122
of 1,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,283
of 332,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.