| Title |
Qu(e)erying Sex and Gender in Archaeology: a Critique of the “Third” and Other Sexual Categories
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10816-016-9294-y |
| Authors |
Enrique Moral |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 22% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 96% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 28 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 30% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,196,007
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#61
of 373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,144
of 379,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them