↓ Skip to main content

Serum Uric Acid Concentrations in Meat Eaters, Fish Eaters, Vegetarians and Vegans: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in the EPIC-Oxford Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
65 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serum Uric Acid Concentrations in Meat Eaters, Fish Eaters, Vegetarians and Vegans: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in the EPIC-Oxford Cohort
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie A. Schmidt, Francesca L. Crowe, Paul N. Appleby, Timothy J. Key, Ruth C. Travis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 166 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 19%
Student > Master 25 15%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 39 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 44 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#653,766
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,802
of 220,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,188
of 295,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#197
of 5,179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.