You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Serum Uric Acid Concentrations in Meat Eaters, Fish Eaters, Vegetarians and Vegans: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in the EPIC-Oxford Cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0056339 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie A. Schmidt, Francesca L. Crowe, Paul N. Appleby, Timothy J. Key, Ruth C. Travis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 13% |
| United States | 8 | 13% |
| Mexico | 3 | 5% |
| Brazil | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 14% |
| Scientists | 5 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 45 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#680,939
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,112
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,414
of 297,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#202
of 5,182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.