↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypic Variability of Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type V Caused by an IFITM5 Mutation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypic Variability of Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type V Caused by an IFITM5 Mutation
Published in
Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/jbmr.1891
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay R Shapiro, Caressa Lietman, Monica Grover, James T Lu, Sandesh CS Nagamani, Brian C Dawson, Dustin M Baldridge, Matthew N Bainbridge, Dan H Cohn, Maria Blazo, Timothy T Roberts, Feng‐Shu Brennen, Yimei Wu, Richard A Gibbs, Pamela Melvin, Philippe M Campeau, Brendan H Lee

Abstract

In a large cohort of osteogenesis imperfecta type V (OI type V) patients (17 individuals from 12 families), we identified the same mutation in the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) of the interferon-induced transmembrane protein 5 (IFITM5) gene by whole exome and Sanger sequencing (IFITM5 c.-14C > T) and provide a detailed description of their phenotype. This mutation leads to the creation of a novel start codon adding five residues to IFITM5 and was recently reported in several other OI type V families. The variability of the phenotype was quite large even within families. Whereas some patients presented with the typical calcification of the forearm interosseous membrane, radial head dislocation and hyperplastic callus (HPC) formation following fractures, others had only some of the typical OI type V findings. Thirteen had calcification of interosseous membranes, 14 had radial head dislocations, 10 had HPC, 9 had long bone bowing, 11 could ambulate without assistance, and 1 had mild unilateral mixed hearing loss. The bone mineral density varied greatly, even within families. Our study thus highlights the phenotypic variability of OI type V caused by the IFITM5 mutation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Unspecified 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Unspecified 6 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,974,809
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#1,729
of 4,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,732
of 297,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.