↓ Skip to main content

Risk, uncertainty and discrete choice models

Overview of attention for article published in Marketing Letters, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
Title
Risk, uncertainty and discrete choice models
Published in
Marketing Letters, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11002-008-9047-0
Authors

Andre de Palma, Moshe Ben-Akiva, David Brownstone, Charles Holt, Thierry Magnac, Daniel McFadden, Peter Moffatt, Nathalie Picard, Kenneth Train, Peter Wakker, Joan Walker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Japan 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 209 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 35%
Student > Master 27 12%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 6%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 29 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 63 27%
Engineering 39 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 30 13%
Social Sciences 20 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 44 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,965,990
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Marketing Letters
#86
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,743
of 81,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marketing Letters
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.