| Title |
Understanding slums: analysis of the metabolic pattern of the Vidigal favela in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environment, Development and Sustainability, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10668-016-9810-y |
| Authors |
Raul F. C. Miranda, Carolina Grottera, Mario Giampietro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 23% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 13% |
| Engineering | 6 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,488,524
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Environment, Development and Sustainability
#502
of 969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,823
of 333,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment, Development and Sustainability
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.