| Title |
Habitat selection disruption and lateralization impairment of cryptic flatfish in a warm, acid, and contaminated ocean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-016-2994-8 |
| Authors |
Eduardo Sampaio, Ana Luísa Maulvault, Vanessa M. Lopes, José R. Paula, Vera Barbosa, Ricardo Alves, Pedro Pousão-Ferreira, Tiago Repolho, António Marques, Rui Rosa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2016.
All research outputs
#5,668,358
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#898
of 3,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,815
of 322,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#15
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.