↓ Skip to main content

Visualising health risks with medical imaging for changing recipients’ health behaviours and risk factors: Systematic review with meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visualising health risks with medical imaging for changing recipients’ health behaviours and risk factors: Systematic review with meta-analysis
Published in
PLOS Medicine, March 2022
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003920
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gareth J. Hollands, Juliet A. Usher-Smith, Rana Hasan, Florence Alexander, Natasha Clarke, Simon J. Griffin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 18 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Psychology 3 7%
Unspecified 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2023.
All research outputs
#450,509
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#748
of 5,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,493
of 448,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#26
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.