↓ Skip to main content

Australian mental health nurses’ perspectives about the identification and management of antipsychotic medication side effects: a cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mental Health, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Australian mental health nurses’ perspectives about the identification and management of antipsychotic medication side effects: a cross-sectional survey
Published in
Journal of Mental Health, October 2016
DOI 10.1080/09638237.2016.1222060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Morrison, Norman J. Stomski, Tom Meehan

Abstract

Currently, little is known about mental health nurses' management of antipsychotic medication side effects. This study examined how Australian mental health nurses' attitudes and service processes influence the assessment of antipsychotic medication side effects. Participants were included if they were registered nurses in Australian mental health settings. An online questionnaire was distributed via email. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine associations between attitudes and awareness, and use of antipsychotic medication assessment tools. Only one quarter of the respondents were currently using a tool. In cases where the service had a clear system for agreeing responsibility about monitoring consumers between primary and secondary care, respondents were three times more likely to still be using one or more tool. When the service had reliable systems in place to remind staff that side effect assessments were due, respondents were five times more likely to continue using assessment tools. Australian mental nurses are not routinely using antipsychotic medication side effect assessment tools. The routine use of assessment tools would improve if systems were implemented to enhance their use.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Psychology 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 16 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,344,065
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mental Health
#928
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,319
of 324,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mental Health
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.