| Title |
Proceedings of the International Cancer Imaging Society (ICIS) 16th Annual Teaching Course
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Imaging, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40644-016-0079-z |
| Authors |
Dow-Mu Koh, Sue Creviston Kaste, Sarah J. Vinnicombe, Giovanni Morana, Andrea Rossi, Christian J. Herold, Theresa C. McLoud, Kirk A. Frey, Bernhard Gebauer, Derek Roebuck, Jurgen J. Fütterer, Alexander J. Towbin, Thierry A. G. Huisman, Anne M. J. B. Smets, Giovanni Morana, Jeong Min Lee, Hersh Chandarana, Marius E. Mayerhoefer, Markus Raderer, Alexander Haug, Matthias Eiber, Bernhard Gebauer, Andrea Rockall, Aslam Sohaib, Victoria S Warbey, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Dow-Mu Koh, Jay P. Heiken, Isaac R. Francis, Mahmoud M. Al-Hawary, Ravi K. Kaza, Giovanni Morana, Mirko D’Onofrio, Harriet C. Thoeny, Ann D. King, Giovanni Morana, Arnoldo Piccardo, Maria Luisa Garrè, Andrea Rossi, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Theresa C. McLoud, Nick Reed, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, Hersh Chandarana, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Isaac R. Francis, Ashish P. Wasnik, Stefan Diederich, Jurgen J. Fütterer, Wim J. G. Oyen, Cheng Lee Chaw, Nicholas van As, Igor Vieira, Frederik De Keyzer, Elleke Dresen, Sileny Han, Ignace Vergote, Philippe Moerman, Frederic Amant, Michel Koole, Vincent Vandecaveye, R. Dresen, S. De Vuysere, F. De Keyzer, E. Van Cutsem, A. D’Hoore, A. Wolthuis, V. Vandecaveye, P. Pricolo, S. Alessi, P. Summers, E. Tagliabue, G. Petralia, C. Pfannenberg, B. Gückel, S. C. Schüle, A. C. Müller, S. Kaufmann, N. Schwenzer, M. Reimold, C. la Fougere, K. Nikolaou, P. Martus, G. J. Cook, G. K. Azad, B. P. Taylor, M. Siddique, J. John, J. Mansi, M. Harries, V. Goh, S. Seth, R. Burgul, A. Seth, S. Waugh, N. Muhammad Gowdh, C. Purdie, A. Evans, E. Crowe, A. Thompson, S. Vinnicombe, F. Arfeen, T. Campion, E. Goldstraw, M. D’Onofrio, V. Ciaravino, S. Crosara, R. De Robertis, R. Pozzi Mucelli, M. Uhrig, D. Simons, H. Schlemmer, Kate Downey, S. Murdoch, A. S. Al-adhami, S. Viswanathan, S. Smith, P. Jennings, D. Bowers, R. Soomal, S. Smith, P. Jennings, D. Bowers, R. Soomal, T. M. Mutala, A. O. Odhiambo, N. Harish, P. Pricolo, S. Alessi, P. Summers, E. Tagliabue, G. Petralia, M. Hall, M. Sproule, S. Sheridan, K. Y. Thein, C. H. Tan, Y. L. Thian, C. M. Ho, S. De Luca, C. Carrera, V. Blanchet, L. Alarcón, E. Eyheremnedy, B. K. Choudhury, K. Bujarbarua, G. Barman, G. J. Cook, E. Lovat, M. Siddique, V. Goh, R. Ferner, V. S. Warbey, L. Potti, B. Kaye, A. Beattie, K. Dutton, A. A. Seth, F. Constantinidis, H. Dobson, A. A. Seth, F. Constantinidis, H. Dobson, R. Bradley, G. Bozas, G. Avery, A. Stephens, A. Maraveyas, S. Bhuva, C. A. Johnson, M. Subesinghe, N. Taylor, L. E. Quint, R. M. Reddy, G. P. Kalemkerian, G. González Zapico, E. Gainza Jauregui, R. Álvarez Francisco, S. Ibáñez Alonso, I. Tavera Bahillo, L. Múgica Álvarez, O. Francies, R. Wheeler, L. Childs, A. Adams, A. Sahdev, S. E. De Luca, M. E. Casalini Vañek, M. D. Pascuzzi, T. Gillanders, P. M. Ramos, E. P. Eyheremendy, C. Stove, M. Digby, M. Nazar, M. Wirtz, M. D. Pascuzzi, F. Troncoso, F. Saguier, E. P. Eyheremendy, D. J. Quint, L. Dang, M. Carlson, S. Leber, F. Silverstein, R. Rueben, S. Viswanathan, B. Nazir, T. H. Teo, J. B. Khoo, K. Sharma, N. Gupta, B. Mathew, T. Jeyakumar, K. Harkins, K. Sharma, B. Mathew, N. Gupta, T. Jeyakumar, S. Joshua, D. Christodoulou, S. Gourtsoyianni, A. Jacques, N. Griffin, V. Goh, C. A. Johnson, J. Lee, J. A. Goodfellow, A. S. Al-adhami, S. Viswanathan, R. Bradley, R. Bradley, A. Yong, S. Jenkins, G. Joseph, S. Bhuva, K. Partington, C. A. Johnson, S. Bhuva, M. Subesinghe, N. Taylor, C. Carrera, A. Zanfardini, S. De Luca, L. Alarcón, V. Blanchet, E. P. Eyheremendy, K. Cavanagh, E. Lau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Imaging
#604
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,874
of 329,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Imaging
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.