You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cost-utility analysis of community occupational therapy in dementia (COTiD-UK) versus usual care: Results from VALID, a multi-site randomised controlled trial in the UK
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0262828 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elena Pizzo, Jennifer Wenborn, Jane Burgess, Jacqueline Mundy, Martin Orrell, Michael King, Rumana Omar, Stephen Morris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 23 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 23 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,800,681
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#123,724
of 194,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,811
of 506,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,568
of 4,150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.