↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Language Skill in Child Psychopathology: Implications for Intervention in the Early Years

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Language Skill in Child Psychopathology: Implications for Intervention in the Early Years
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10567-016-0214-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Salmon, Richard O’Kearney, Elaine Reese, Clare-Ann Fortune

Abstract

In this narrative review, we suggest that children's language skill should be targeted in clinical interventions for children with emotional and behavioral difficulties in the preschool years. We propose that language skill predicts childhood emotional and behavioral problems and this relationship may be mediated by children's self-regulation and emotion understanding skills. In the first sections, we review recent high-quality longitudinal studies which together demonstrate that that children's early language skill predicts: (1) emotional and behavioral problems, and this relationship is stronger than the reverse pattern; (2) self-regulation skill; this pattern may be stronger than the reverse pattern but moderated by child age. Findings also suggest that self-regulation skill mediates the relation between early language skill and children's emotional and behavioral problems. There is insufficient evidence regarding the mediating role of emotion understanding. In subsequent sections, we review evidence demonstrating that: (1) particular kinds of developmentally targeted parent-child conversations play a vital role in the development of language skill, and (2) some current clinical interventions, directly or indirectly, have a beneficial impact on children's vocabulary and narrative skills, but most approaches are ad hoc. Targeting language via parent-child conversation has the potential to improve the outcomes of current clinical interventions in the preschool years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 189 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Student > Master 25 13%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 50 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 80 42%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Linguistics 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 64 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,584,724
of 25,503,365 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#71
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,791
of 331,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,503,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.