↓ Skip to main content

酵母の液胞

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF BREWING,JAPAN, January 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
酵母の液胞
Published in
JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF BREWING,JAPAN, January 1985
DOI 10.6013/jbrewsocjapan1915.80.11
Authors

大隅 良典, 安楽 泰宏, 北本 勝ひこ

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF BREWING,JAPAN
#64
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,134
of 39,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF BREWING,JAPAN
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.