↓ Skip to main content

Multivariate analysis of behavioural response experiments in humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Biology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multivariate analysis of behavioural response experiments in humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae)
Published in
Journal of Experimental Biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1242/jeb.071498
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca A. Dunlop, Michael J. Noad, Douglas H. Cato, Eric Kniest, Patrick J. O. Miller, Joshua N. Smith, M. Dale Stokes

Abstract

The behavioural response study (BRS) is an experimental design used by field biologists to determine the function and/or behavioural effects of conspecific, heterospecific or anthropogenic stimuli. When carrying out these studies in marine mammals it is difficult to make basic observations and achieve sufficient samples sizes because of the high cost and logistical difficulties. Rarely are other factors such as social context or the physical environment considered in the analysis because of these difficulties. This paper presents results of a BRS carried out in humpback whales to test the response of groups to one recording of conspecific social sounds and an artificially generated tone stimulus. Experiments were carried out in September/October 2004 and 2008 during the humpback whale southward migration along the east coast of Australia. In total, 13 'tone' experiments, 15 'social sound' experiments (using one recording of social sounds) and three silent controls were carried out over two field seasons. The results (using a mixed model statistical analysis) suggested that humpback whales responded differently to the two stimuli, measured by changes in course travelled and dive behaviour. Although the response to 'tones' was consistent, in that groups moved offshore and surfaced more often (suggesting an aversion to the stimulus), the response to 'social sounds' was highly variable and dependent upon the composition of the social group. The change in course and dive behaviour in response to 'tones' was found to be related to proximity to the source, the received signal level and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This study demonstrates that the behavioural responses of marine mammals to acoustic stimuli are complex. In order to tease out such multifaceted interactions, the number of replicates and factors measured must be sufficient for multivariate analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 156 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 21%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Master 19 11%
Other 11 7%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 55%
Environmental Science 32 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 25 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Biology
#6,948
of 9,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,822
of 250,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Biology
#116
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.