↓ Skip to main content

Design and Cohort Characteristics of the Social Spectrum Study: A Multicenter Study of the Autism Spectrum Among Clinically Referred Children

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Design and Cohort Characteristics of the Social Spectrum Study: A Multicenter Study of the Autism Spectrum Among Clinically Referred Children
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10803-016-2919-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorieke Duvekot, Leontine W. ten Hoopen, Geerte Slappendel, Jan van der Ende, Frank C. Verhulst, Ad van der Sijde, Kirstin Greaves-Lord

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the design and cohort characteristics of the Social Spectrum Study: a clinical cohort study that used a two-phase sampling design to identify children at risk for ASD. After screening 1281 children aged 2.5-10 years who had been consecutively referred to one of six mental health services in the Netherlands, children who screened positive for ASD (n = 428) and a random selection of screen negatives (n = 240) were invited to participate in diagnostic assessments and questionnaires regarding the child, family and society. A 1-year follow-up was also conducted. Results from this study may contribute to knowledge of the identification and characterization of children with ASD, family processes, and the impact of ASD on the family and society.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 29%
Social Sciences 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 28 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,627,032
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,514
of 5,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,697
of 329,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#29
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.