↓ Skip to main content

The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response
Published in
Conservation Letters, March 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00164.x
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 5 2%
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 213 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 15%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Other 13 6%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 61 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 73 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 <1%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 69 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2025.
All research outputs
#786,877
of 28,868,037 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#261
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,526
of 129,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,868,037 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.