↓ Skip to main content

Effect of a Mediterranean type diet on inflammatory and cartilage degradation biomarkers in patients with osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Effect of a Mediterranean type diet on inflammatory and cartilage degradation biomarkers in patients with osteoarthritis
Published in
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12603-016-0806-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Dyer, G. Davison, S.M. Marcora, Alexis R. Mauger

Abstract

To investigate the effects of a Mediterranean type diet on patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Ninety-nine volunteers with OA (aged 31 - 90 years) completed the study (83% female). Southeast of England, UK. Participants were randomly allocated to the dietary intervention (DIET, n = 50) or control (CON, n = 49). The DIET group were asked to follow a Mediterranean type diet for 16 weeks whereas the CON group were asked to follow their normal diet. All participants completed an Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS2) pre-, mid- and post- study period. A subset of participants attended a clinic at the start and end of the study for assessment of joint range of motion, ROM (DIET = 33, CON = 28), and to provide blood samples (DIET = 29, CON = 25) for biomarker analysis (including serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (sCOMP) (a marker of cartilage degradation) and a panel of other relevant biomarkers including pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines). There were no differences between groups in the response of any AIMS2 components and most biomarkers (p > 0.05), except the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1α, which decreased in the DIET group (~47%, p = 0.010). sCOMP decreased in the DIET group by 1 U/L (~8%, p = 0.014). There was a significant improvement in knee flexion and hip rotation ROM in the DIET group (p < 0.05). The average reduction in sCOMP in the DIET group (1 U/L) represents a meaningful change, but the longer term effects require further study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 19%
Student > Master 20 12%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 59 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 33 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 63 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,347,400
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#748
of 1,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,281
of 331,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.