↓ Skip to main content

Trauma-Informed HIV Prevention and Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Trauma-Informed HIV Prevention and Treatment
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11904-016-0337-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica M. Sales, Andrea Swartzendruber, Ashley L. Phillips

Abstract

The high prevalence of trauma and its negative impact on health and health-promoting behaviors underscore the need for multi-level interventions to address trauma and its associated sequelae to improve physical and mental well-being in both HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected populations. Growing global awareness of the intersection of trauma and HIV has resulted in development and testing of interventions to address trauma in the context of HIV treatment and HIV prevention in the USA and globally. Despite increasing recognition of the widespread nature of trauma and the importance of trauma to HIV transmission around the globe, several gaps remain. Through a survey of the literature, we identified eight studies (published in the past 5 years) describing interventions to address the effects of trauma on HIV-related outcomes. In particular, this study focused on the levels of intervention, populations the interventions were designed to benefit, and types of trauma addressed in the interventions in the context of both HIV prevention and treatment. Remarkably absent from the HIV prevention, interventions reviewed were interventions designed to address violence experienced by men or transgender individuals, in the USA or globally. Given the pervasive nature of trauma experienced generally, but especially among individuals at heightened risk for HIV, future HIV prevention interventions universally should consider becoming trauma-informed. Widespread acknowledgement of the pervasive impact of gender-based violence on HIV outcomes among women has led to multiple calls for trauma-informed care (TIC) approaches to improve the effectiveness of HIV services for HIV-infected women. TIC approaches may be relevant for and should also be tested among men and all groups with high co-occurring epidemics of HIV and trauma (e.g., men who have sex with men (MSM), transgendered populations, injection drug users, sex workers), regardless of type of trauma experience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 165 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 44 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 35 21%
Psychology 25 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 54 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,344,065
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#409
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,841
of 319,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.