You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diabetes and risk of pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis from the pancreatic cancer cohort consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-012-0078-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanne W. Elena, Emily Steplowski, Kai Yu, Patricia Hartge, Geoffrey S. Tobias, Michelle J. Brotzman, Stephen J. Chanock, Rachael Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon, Alan A. Arslan, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Kathy Helzlsouer, Eric J. Jacobs, Andrea LaCroix, Gloria Petersen, Wei Zheng, Demetrius Albanes, Naomi E. Allen, Laufey Amundadottir, Ying Bao, Heiner Boeing, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Julie E. Buring, J. Michael Gaziano, Edward L. Giovannucci, Eric J. Duell, Göran Hallmans, Barbara V. Howard, David J. Hunter, Amy Hutchinson, Kevin B. Jacobs, Charles Kooperberg, Peter Kraft, Julie B. Mendelsohn, Dominique S. Michaud, Domenico Palli, Lawrence S. Phillips, Kim Overvad, Alpa V. Patel, Leah Sansbury, Xiao-Ou Shu, Michael S. Simon, Nadia Slimani, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Kala Visvanathan, Jarmo Virtamo, Brian M. Wolpin, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Charles S. Fuchs, Robert N. Hoover, Myron Gross |
| Abstract |
Diabetes is a suspected risk factor for pancreatic cancer, but questions remain about whether it is a risk factor or a result of the disease. This study prospectively examined the association between diabetes and the risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in pooled data from the NCI pancreatic cancer cohort consortium (PanScan). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 44 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2016.
All research outputs
#2,536,251
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#280
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,995
of 186,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.