↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric neurofibromatosis type 2: clinical and molecular presentation, management of vestibular schwannomas, and hearing rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Pediatric neurofibromatosis type 2: clinical and molecular presentation, management of vestibular schwannomas, and hearing rehabilitation
Published in
Child's Nervous System, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00381-016-3257-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas -Xavier Bonne, Rabih Aboukais, Marc Baroncini, Audrey Hochart, Pierre Leblond, Franck Broly, Frédérique Dubrulle, Jean-Paul Lejeune, Christophe Vincent

Abstract

This study aims to describe the clinical and molecular presentation of pediatric neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and the subsequent management of vestibular schwannomas (VS) and hearing rehabilitation. This is a single-center retrospective study of neurofibromatosis type 2 diagnosed before the age of 18 years old from 1997. Natural history of vestibular schwannomas and surgical outcomes were evaluated using volumetric MRI, hearing, and facial nerve assessment. Patients included in chemotherapy protocols were excluded. From a database of 80 patients followed up for NF2 on a regular basis, 25 patients were eligible (11 sporadic cases, 14 inherited in five families). The mean age at diagnosis was 11.6 years old. The average clinical follow-up was 6.5 years. NF2 mutation was identified in 81 % of the probands. The average growth rate based on the maximum linear diameter (DGR) was 1.68 mm/year (n = 33, average follow-up 4.22 years) and 545 mm(3)/year in volumetric assessment (VGR) for VS larger than 1 cm (n = 21, average follow-up 3.4 years). In unoperated ears, hearing was stable in about 50 % of ears. The mean change in dB HL was 9.5 dB/year for pure-tone average and 3.5 for speech-recognition threshold (n = 34, 5.5 years 1-12). Eight children required removal through a translabyrinthine approach (mean follow-up was 4.5 years), six patients were operated on for hearing preservation (mean postoperative follow-up 4.3 years). Six patients were eligible for hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implantation (I), and five received placement of an auditory brainstem implant. Early diagnosis and treatment of small growing VS should be carefully discussed considering familial history and possible rehabilitation with a CI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Unspecified 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Unspecified 6 10%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,473,108
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#1,434
of 2,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,043
of 319,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#24
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,765 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.