↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Characterization of graphomotor functions in individuals with Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: Characterization of graphomotor functions in individuals with Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, October 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13428-016-0815-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nan-Ying Yu, Arend W. A. Van Gemmert, Shao-Hsia Chang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#2,099
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,874
of 329,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#30
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.