Title |
Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Palliative Care, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-684x-12-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Barbara Gomes, Natalia Calanzani, Marjolein Gysels, Sue Hall, Irene J Higginson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 30 | 34% |
United States | 10 | 11% |
Canada | 4 | 5% |
Spain | 3 | 3% |
Australia | 3 | 3% |
New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
Mexico | 2 | 2% |
Ireland | 2 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 56 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 19% |
Scientists | 12 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 462 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
Japan | 3 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 446 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 80 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 12% |
Researcher | 51 | 11% |
Other | 36 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 7% |
Other | 92 | 20% |
Unknown | 113 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 161 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 73 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 37 | 8% |
Psychology | 14 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 6 | 1% |
Other | 33 | 7% |
Unknown | 138 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#447,195
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Palliative Care
#8
of 1,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,548
of 313,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Palliative Care
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.