↓ Skip to main content

Subthalamic nucleus stimulation effects on single and combined task performance in Parkinson’s disease patients: a PET study

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Subthalamic nucleus stimulation effects on single and combined task performance in Parkinson’s disease patients: a PET study
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11682-016-9588-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cyril Atkinson-Clement, Audrey Maillet, Didier LeBars, Franck Lavenne, Jérôme Redouté, Alexandre Krainik, Pierre Pollak, Stéphane Thobois, Serge Pinto

Abstract

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) represents one of the most efficacious treatments for Parkinson's disease, along with L-dopa therapy. The objective of the present work was to identify the cerebral networks associated with hand movement and speech production tasks performed alone and simultaneously, as well as the effects of STN-DBS on these profiles. Clinical, behavioral, and neuroimaging (oxygen 15-labeled water and Positron Emission Tomography) investigations were used to study single and combined performances of unilateral hand movements and speech production in 11 unmedicated individuals with PD, both off and on STN-DBS. Specifically, a flexible factorial design with the tasks (hand movement, speech production, combined task) and the STN-DBS conditions (off, on) as main factors was chosen for brain activation statistical analysis, using a Family-Wise Error corrected p-value at the cluster level of at least 10 contiguous voxels. Increased activation of fronto-parietal and cingulate areas was observed under STN-DBS for hand movement in single and combined tasks, respectively, reflecting a partial restoration of cortico-sub-cortical connections. The lack of results for speech production for both off and on STN-DBS could illustrate its relatively poor response to the treatment. STN-DBS tended to restore the additive function capacity that can be achieved when performing the combined task. We confirmed with original neuroimaging data that speech is much less responsive to STN-DBS than any other motor function and we concluded that speech outcomes following STN-DBS can be different from those observed pre-operatively following L-dopa administration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 16%
Neuroscience 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 20 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,385,802
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#669
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,635
of 319,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#33
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.