↓ Skip to main content

Biological control of plant diseases by inter-cropping and mixed-cropping.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Weed Science and Technology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological control of plant diseases by inter-cropping and mixed-cropping.
Published in
Journal of Weed Science and Technology, January 2011
DOI 10.3719/weed.56.14
Authors

Toshio Kijima

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 67%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 67%
Environmental Science 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,119,076
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Weed Science and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,192
of 188,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Weed Science and Technology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.