| Title |
Is Non-genetic Inheritance Just a Proximate Mechanism? A Corroboration of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Theory, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13752-013-0091-5 |
| Authors |
Alex Mesoudi, Simon Blanchet, Anne Charmantier, Étienne Danchin, Laurel Fogarty, Eva Jablonka, Kevin N. Laland, Thomas J. H. Morgan, Gerd B. Müller, F. John Odling-Smee, Benoît Pujol |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 20% |
| Researcher | 30 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Professor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 45% |
| Psychology | 18 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 7% |
| Philosophy | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,873,619
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Biological Theory
#171
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,050
of 294,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Theory
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.