↓ Skip to main content

Multiple health care visits related to a pediatric emergency visit for young children with common illnesses

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Multiple health care visits related to a pediatric emergency visit for young children with common illnesses
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00431-013-1968-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Angoulvant, S. Jumel, S. Prot-Labarthe, X. Bellettre, M. Kahil, A. Smail, L. Morin, C. Alberti

Abstract

We aim to describe the number of health care visits before and after pediatric emergency department (PED) visits for common illnesses in a French tertiary pediatric hospital. This was a prospective cohort study with 501 children under 6 years of age who were evaluated and discharged from a tertiary care PED. Enrollment occurred on eight randomly selected study days between November 2010 and June 2011. The caregivers were then contacted via telephone 8 days later to obtain follow-up data, including information about return visits to health care facilities. Multiple visits were made by 206 (41 %) children, previous visits had occurred for 139 (28 %) children, and return visits had occurred for 94 (19 %) children. Previous and return visits were made at the PED as well as in general practitioners' offices and private pediatric offices. The median age of the subjects was 18 months. Fever was the most common complaint and was associated with more frequent multiple heath care visits. Conclusion: Multiple heath care visits for the same illness are frequent, especially for febrile children. Interestingly, this phenomenon concerns every type of health care facility, including the PED, general practitioners' offices, and private pediatric offices. Further studies should be performed to achieve a better understanding of this phenomenon and to test specific interventions, such as parental education and improvement of the information system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Psychology 7 12%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2013.
All research outputs
#20,182,546
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#3,417
of 3,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,555
of 287,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#34
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.