You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validating the reliability of passive acoustic localisation: a novel method for encountering rare and remote Antarctic blue whales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Endangered Species Research, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3354/esr00642 |
| Authors |
BS Miller, J Barlow, S Calderan, K Collins, R Leaper, P Olson, P Ensor, D Peel, D Donnelly, V Andrews-Goff, C Olavarria, K Owen, M Rekdahl, N Schmitt, V Wadley, J Gedamke, N Gales, MC Double |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 60% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 10% |
| Finland | 1 | 10% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 14% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,200,889
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Endangered Species Research
#299
of 753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,188
of 352,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endangered Species Research
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.