↓ Skip to main content

Bioproduction of riboflavin: a bright yellow history

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 1,612)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Bioproduction of riboflavin: a bright yellow history
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10295-016-1842-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Luis Revuelta, Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro, Patricia Lozano-Martinez, David Díaz-Fernández, Rubén M Buey, Alberto Jiménez

Abstract

Riboflavin (vitamin B2) is an essential nutrient for humans and animals that must be obtained from the diet. To ensure an optimal supply, riboflavin is used on a large scale as additive in the food and feed industries. Here, we describe a historical overview of the industrial process of riboflavin production starting from its discovery and the need to produce the vitamin in bulk at prices that would allow for their use in human and animal nutrition. Riboflavin was produced industrially by chemical synthesis for many decades. At present, the development of economical and eco-efficient fermentation processes, which are mainly based on Bacillus subtilis and Ashbya gossypii strains, has replaced the synthetic process at industrial scale. A detailed account is given of the development of the riboflavin overproducer strains as well as future prospects for its improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 21%
Student > Master 23 16%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Other 6 4%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 38 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 12%
Chemistry 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 41 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,655,680
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#44
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,771
of 324,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.