↓ Skip to main content

Fluid resuscitation with 6 % hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4 and 130/0.42) in acutely ill patients: systematic review of effects on mortality and treatment with renal replacement therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Fluid resuscitation with 6 % hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4 and 130/0.42) in acutely ill patients: systematic review of effects on mortality and treatment with renal replacement therapy
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00134-013-2840-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Gattas, Arina Dan, John Myburgh, Laurent Billot, Serigne Lo, Simon Finfer, CHEST Management Committee

Abstract

To determine whether fluid resuscitation of acutely ill adults with 6 % hydroxyethyl starch (6 % HES 130) with a molecular weight of 130 kD and a molar substitution ratio of approximately 0.4 (6 % HES 130) compared with other resuscitation fluids results in a difference in the relative risk of death or treatment with renal replacement therapy (RRT).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 15%
Other 20 14%
Student > Postgraduate 15 11%
Student > Master 12 9%
Professor 12 9%
Other 43 31%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 69%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,675,283
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,434
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,435
of 302,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#13
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.