| Title |
Die ambulante Betreuung von Patienten mit somatisch nicht erklärten Beschwerden
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Der Nervenarzt, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00115-016-0226-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Döpfmer, M. C. Münchmeyer, T. Natschke, W. Herrmann, F. Holzinger, R. Burian, A. Berghöfer, C. Heintze |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to compare the approach of general practitioners (GP) and outpatient specialists for psychiatry, neurology or psychosomatic medicine to patients with somatically unexplained complaints. Qualitative interviews were conducted with general practitioners in Berlin and with outpatient specialists. Interviews were analyzed by qualitative content analysis. Both GPs and specialists rarely used structured diagnostic instruments. Guidelines are seen and used with reservation throughout the different specialties. Similar to the GPs, most of the specialists surveyed in this study had reservations against the necessity of a precise coding according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). In outpatient care the concern for the individual patient is the connecting element between different medical specialties. This results in a differential diagnostic and therapeutic approach that is not automatically in line with guidelines. The development of common concepts in ambulatory care might help to meet the demands of this complex group of patients with somatically unexplained complaints. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 2 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Design | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#19,201,293
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Der Nervenarzt
#666
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,888
of 321,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Der Nervenarzt
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.