↓ Skip to main content

Darwin’s warm little pond revisited: from molecules to the origin of life

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Darwin’s warm little pond revisited: from molecules to the origin of life
Published in
The Science of Nature, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00114-009-0602-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hartmut Follmann, Carol Brownson

Abstract

All known cosmic and geological conditions and laws of chemistry and thermodynamics allow that complex organic matter could have formed spontaneously on pristine planet Earth about 4,000 mya. Simple gasses and minerals on the surface and in oceans of the early Earth reacted and were eventually organized in supramolecular aggregates and enveloped cells that evolved into primitive forms of life. Chemical evolution, which preceded all species of extant organisms, is a fact. In this review, we have concentrated on experimental and theoretical research published over the last two decades, which has added a wealth of new details and helped to close gaps in our previous understanding of this multifaceted field. Recent exciting progress in the molecular and genetic analyses of existing life, in particular microorganisms of ancient origin, even supports the possibility that a cellular, self-reproducing common ancestor might be assembled and resurrected in anaerobic cultures at some time in the future. Charles Darwin did not, and indeed, could not, address and specify the earliest phases of life which preceded the Origin of Species. However, in a famous letter, he sketched "a warm little pond with all sorts of... (chemicals, in which) ...a protein was chemically formed." We try to trace the impact of his charming clear-sighted metaphor up to the present time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Germany 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 157 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 21%
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 8%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 31%
Chemistry 25 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 11%
Physics and Astronomy 8 5%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 23 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,965,367
of 25,123,616 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#364
of 2,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,268
of 102,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,123,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.