↓ Skip to main content

Antibody-Based Drugs and Approaches Against Amyloid-β Species for Alzheimer’s Disease Immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Antibody-Based Drugs and Approaches Against Amyloid-β Species for Alzheimer’s Disease Immunotherapy
Published in
Drugs & Aging, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40266-016-0406-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Liu, Bin Yang, Jun Ke, Wenjia Li, Wen-Chen Suen

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD), one of the most devastating diseases for the older population, has become a major healthcare burden in the increasingly aging society worldwide. Currently, there are still only symptomatic treatments available on the market, just to slow down disease progression. In the past decades, extensive research focusing on the development of immunotherapy using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) as potential "disease-modifying drugs" has shown promise in inhibiting or clearing the formation of toxic amyloid-β (Aβ) species, the suspected causative agents of AD. As a result, these potential life-saving drugs can break the amyloid cascade, cease neurodegeneration, and prevent further reduction in cognitive and physical function. In this review, we first describe the polymorphisms of Aβ species, comprising three different pools, including monomers, soluble oligomers, and insoluble fibrils, with each pool encompassing multiple structures of Aβ aggregation. A comprehensive review on their toxicities follows in relation to the characterized epitopes of anti-Aβ mAb candidates under development. We then present the outcomes of these mAbs in clinical or pre-clinical trials and conclude by providing a summary of other novel and promising antibody-based immunotherapeutic approaches that deserve more attention for the effective treatment of AD in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 8 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 26 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 14%
Neuroscience 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,133,627
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#196
of 1,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,747
of 319,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.