You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional MRI reveals expert-novice differences during sport-related anticipation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NeuroReport, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1097/wnr.0b013e328333dff2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J. Wright, Daniel T. Bishop, Robin C. Jackson, Bruce Abernethy |
| Abstract |
We examined the effect of expertise on cortical activation during sports anticipation using functional MRI. In experiment 1, recreational players predicted badminton stroke direction and the pattern of active clusters was consistent with a proposed perception-of-action network. This pattern was not replicated in a stimulus-matched, action-unrelated control task. In experiment 2, players of three different skill levels anticipated stroke direction from clips occluded either 160 ms before or 80 ms after racquet-shuttle contact. Early-occluded sequences produced more activation than late-occluded sequences overall, in most cortical regions of interest, but experts showed an additional enhancement in medial, dorsolateral and ventrolateral frontal cortex. Anticipation in open-skill sports engages cortical areas integral to observing and understanding others' actions; such activity is enhanced in experts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 26% |
| Unknown | 17 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 26% |
| Sports and Recreations | 34 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,227,377
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from NeuroReport
#290
of 3,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,099
of 172,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroReport
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.