You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effective discharge analysis of ecological processes in streams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Water Resources Research, November 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2005wr004222 |
| Authors |
Martin W. Doyle, Emily H. Stanley, David L. Strayer, Robert B. Jacobson, John C. Schmidt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 254 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 67 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 14% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 98 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 48 | 18% |
| Engineering | 23 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 44 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#4,046
of 5,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,542
of 76,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.