↓ Skip to main content

Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Mammalogy, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia
Published in
Australian Mammalogy, January 2012
DOI 10.1071/am11012
Authors

Peter J. S. Fleming, Benjamin L. Allen, Guy-Anthony Ballard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 6 3%
Brazil 4 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 172 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Student > Master 25 13%
Other 13 7%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 50%
Environmental Science 44 23%
Unspecified 5 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 31 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2014.
All research outputs
#4,369,063
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Australian Mammalogy
#115
of 448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,226
of 248,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Mammalogy
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.