| Title |
Delirium and dehydration: some fluid for thought?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-001-0334-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter G. Lawlor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,641,735
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#809
of 4,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,217
of 128,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them