↓ Skip to main content

Discrete p-robust H(div)-liftings and a posteriori estimates for elliptic problems with H-1 source terms

Overview of attention for article published in Calcolo, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Discrete p-robust H(div)-liftings and a posteriori estimates for elliptic problems with H-1 source terms
Published in
Calcolo, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10092-017-0217-4
Authors

Alexandre Ern, Iain Smears, Martin Vohralík

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 60%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,473,108
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Calcolo
#30
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,059
of 419,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcolo
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.