↓ Skip to main content

Neuroimaging findings of Zika virus infection: a review article

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Radiology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 375)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Neuroimaging findings of Zika virus infection: a review article
Published in
Japanese Journal of Radiology, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11604-016-0588-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Zare Mehrjardi, Elham Keshavarz, Andrea Poretti, Adriano N. Hazin

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) is an arbovirus from the Flaviviridae family. It is usually transmitted by mosquito bite. There have been no reports of severe symptoms caused by ZIKV infection up until the last few years. In October 2013 an outbreak was reported in French Polynesia with severe neurological complications in some affected cases. In November 2015, the Ministry of Health of Brazil attributed the increased number of neonatal microcephaly cases in northeastern Brazil to congenital ZIKV infection. The rapid spread of the virus convinced the World Health Organization to announce ZIKV infection as a "Public Health Emergency of International Concern" in February 2016. The main neuroimaging findings in congenital ZIKV infection include microcephaly which is the hallmark of the disease, other malformations of cortical development (e.g., lissencephaly, heterotopia, etc.), parenchymal calcifications, unilateral or bilateral ventriculomegaly, enlarged extra-axial CSF spaces, dysgenesis of the corpus callosum, agenesis of the cavum septum pellucidum, cerebellar and brainstem hypoplasia, and ocular abnormalities. ZIKV infection may also cause Guillain-Barré syndrome and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in adults. Familiarity with neuroimaging findings of congenital and acquired ZIKV infection is crucial to suspect this disease in residents of endemic regions and travelers to these areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 153 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 18%
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 10%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 37 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,634,608
of 23,385,346 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Radiology
#13
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,000
of 321,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Radiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,385,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them