| Title |
How to Review a Manuscript: A “Down-to-Earth” Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Academic Psychiatry, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1176/appi.ap.28.2.81 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Weiss Roberts, John Coverdale, Kristin Edenharder, Alan Louie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 12% |
| Canada | 6 | 10% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 29% |
| Scientists | 14 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Turkey | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 159 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 21% |
| Researcher | 35 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 22% |
| Unknown | 19 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 14% |
| Psychology | 24 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 22% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,209,490
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Academic Psychiatry
#33
of 1,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,032
of 318,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Psychiatry
#5
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.